The city of San Francisco has denied any liability for the Tiger attack at the Zoo on Christmas Day last year. I remember right after that happened that there were stories in the news about how those boys may have been taunting the tiger, as if they had some culpability in the animal's attack on them, which lead to the death of a 17 year old boy.
I never understood that question. Doesn't matter if they were taunting the Tiger or not. There should have been no way for that animal to jump the fence. If this was my TV Judge show, I'd side with the victim's family against the Zoo operators and the city, if they paid to help build the Tiger's habitat. Case closed.